Ahrefs Review — All the Key Pros and Cons

Our content is impartial, but funded in part by affiliate commissions (at no extra cost to our readers). Learn more.

In this Ahrefs review, I dive into the key pros and cons of this leading SEO tool. Should you choose it for your SEO needs — or go with an alternative solution?

Read on to learn more about how Ahrefs stacks up in terms of:

…and more!

(I’ll also discuss some key alternatives to the platform.)

But let’s start with a quick look at the background of this popular SEO solution.

Ahrefs: the background

Founded in 2010 by Dmitry Gerasimenko, Ahrefs is now one of the best-known SEO tools available; it’s used by millions of companies around the world, including big brands like Shopify, eBay, LinkedIn, Uber, Adobe, Zoom and Facebook.

It works by crawling search engines and websites for data, and giving you tools that you can use to:

For example, based on phrases that you give it, Ahrefs can provide keyword suggestions that can be used as the basis for writing copy that is likely to perform well in search results.

It can also tell you how difficult it will be to rank for specific search queries.

It can suggest websites that it could be worth approaching for backlinks.

And it allows you to perform a technical SEO audit on your website to see if there are any technical improvements you can make to it that will help you get better search results.

That’s just scratching the surface of the tool though — there are many other features provided by Ahrefs that are designed to help you improve your search rankings.

Let’s go through these now, starting with a look at domain analysis.

Domain analysis

The starting point for many SEO projects is domain analysis.

This simply means getting a basic overview of the SEO ‘quality’ of a website — how highly it ranks for certain phrases, roughly how much search traffic it gets and so on.

Generally speaking, you perform domain analysis either on your own website — to see where SEO improvements could be made to it — or on a competitor’s, to see how hard it will be to outrank them in search results (and identify ways to do so).

You might also perform domain analysis on a website in order to see if it’s worth approaching its owner for a link from that site to yours (a ‘backlink’).

This is because attaining backlinks from high-quality websites can bring significant improvements to your rankings — Google and other search engines view inbound links as a sign of trustworthiness, and can treat sites with a lot of good backlinks preferentially in search results.

It’s very easy to perform domain analysis in Ahrefs — you just enter a domain into its ‘Site Explorer’ tool to get an immediate overview of that site’s backlink profile and how it’s performing in search results.

(You can do this for whole domains or individual pages on a domain).

Now, the results page you see after entering a URL into Ahrefs’ Site Explorer contains a lot of information.

Key metrics provided include:

(Clicking on most of these metrics will take you to detailed breakdowns of the statistics provided, which you can use to really drill down into the data.)

Of the above metrics, the one that gives you the quickest understanding of site quality is the ‘domain rating’ (or ‘Ahrefs DR’ for short). Ahrefs calculates this score based on the number of domains that point to a website (and their quality).

The higher this score, the more likely a website is to rank for competitive search terms — and the more valuable a ‘backlink’ from it to your site will be.

Now, what’s important to remember about Ahref’s Site Explorer statistics is that while they are based on hard data, they are ultimately estimates based on that data.

In most cases, this is totally fine. Since nobody really knows the inner secrets of search engines’ algorithms (other than the software engineers working for the relevant companies!), search engine optimization is always a process that involves working off best guesses.

In my experience, the only area where you might need to treat the Ahrefs’ results with a bit of extra caution is traffic statistics.

Based on reviewing Google Analytics data that I have access to for various websites, I’ve found that the ‘organic traffic’ figures provided by Ahrefs can sometimes be quite bit inaccurate, especially where sites with lower levels of monthly organic traffic are concerned.

So, it’s best to treat the traffic stats in Ahrefs as something that gives you an indication of site popularity. You can use these figures to help you put your site into context against those of your competitors — or identify websites that clearly generate enough traffic to make it worth approaching them for backlinks (or other marketing collaborations).

You can access some of the Ahrefs data on a per-country basis — by using the ‘countries’ dropdown provided, you can view organic traffic, keywords and traffic value for your chosen country.

Overall, the domain analysis features of Ahrefs are strong — no complaints here.

Now, let’s take a look at Ahrefs’ keyword research features.

Keyword research using Ahrefs

Keyword research generally involves four main things:

Let’s take a look at these key aspects of keyword research with Ahrefs.

Getting keyword data in Ahrefs

To get keyword data in Ahrefs, you need to use its ‘Keywords Explorer’ tool. This is accessible via the main navigation.

Once you’ve entered a keyword into Ahrefs’ keyword explorer tool, you’ll see:

(All this data relates to Google — Ahrefs used to cater for additional search engines, but now focuses exclusively on Google.)

This information is presented in a simple dashboard format, but clicking on individual items will let you drill down into the data in more depth.

As with domain analysis, Ahrefs lets you perform this research on a per-country basis, with a dropdown menu letting you view keyword research data for individual territories.

One of the things I like most about this section of Ahrefs is the data it gives you on the pages that are already ranking highly for a particular search phrase (a ‘SERP overview’).

Not only does this show you things you’d expect — like the domain rating of the sites at the top of the rankings, and the number of backlinks to the pages involved, it also provides a bunch of other useful SEO metrics, like the value of the top ranking pages (based on what it would cost to use PPC to drive an equivalent amount of traffic) and an estimate of the traffic to top ranking pages.

Interestingly — and somewhat uniquely amongst the leading SEO tools we’ve reviewed — this feature also gives you a word count metric (pictured above).

Now, debate rages over whether word count is technically a ranking factor in SEO. But personally, I find word count data helpful, because it give you an idea of how ‘in-depth’ the top ranking content on a given topic typically is, and gives you at least some idea of the kind of depth that Google expects you to go into in order to rank for a particular keyword.

So a thumbs up for this particular feature.

Keyword difficulty scores

The most important metric returned by Ahrefs’ keyword explorer is probably its keyword difficulty score. Ahrefs uses a score out of 100 to indicate this — with a higher score letting you know that it’s going to be harder to rank for a keyword.

As you can see from the below screenshot, Ahrefs can also give you an indication of the number of backlinks (i.e., links from other sites’ content to yours) that you will need to source in order to start ranking in the top 10 results for a particular phrase.

This is a great feature, and one of my favourite things about Ahrefs’ keyword research tool.

However, you should note that this ‘backlink target’ is only provided for Google keyword research — you won’t get a similar link estimate for YouTube, Bing, Yahoo etc. (or indeed any keyword difficulty data at all).

Search volumes

Another key metric returned by Ahrefs’ domain analysis feature is the search volume for a particular phrase — the number of people searching for a keyword per month.

Knowing this is vital, as there is generally not a huge amount of point in trying to rank for a keyword that nobody is searching for!

But in addition to the main monthly search figure (highlighted above), Ahrefs also gives you an indication of the number of times per month that people click on organic results for that keyword.

In the screenshot below, you can see that of the 395,000 searches that are made for ‘hot chocolate’ each month in the USA, 83,000 lead to clicks on the organic results.

(In an increasingly zero-click content environment, this information is important!).

You also get to see how much it would cost to generate a clickthrough using PPC advertising ($1.40 in the example above), and a ‘clicks per search’ ratio (the proportion of people who search for a phrase then click an organic result — 0.21 in the example).

And finally, you get a quick at-a-glance view of trend data — the graph accompanying the keyword volume metric shows you when there were particular spikes or declines in searches for the phrase in question.

This information is all laid out in a very digestible way, and makes it easy to see if a keyword is worth your time.

In terms of how accurate the information provided is however, this is ultimately quite hard to say, as each SEO tool uses its own data sources and algorithms to surface the data.

Keyword suggestions

Although a few keyword suggestions will be surfaced when you enter a keyword into Ahrefs’ keyword explorer tool, to get detailed suggestions based on a phrase you’ve entered, you need to use the platform’s ‘Keyword Ideas’ section, which is located to the left of the main keyword overview dashboard.

Within this, there are three types of keyword suggestion reports to choose from: matching terms, related terms and search suggestions.

With regard to what these all do:

Which set of suggestions is right for you will depend on the type of keyword research you’re doing — but all provide a comprehensive range of keyword suggestions that you can drill down into.

The trick here is to identify phrases that have:

A ‘traffic potential’ score (pictured below) helps you further evaluate the merits of a particular keyword — this figure includes traffic generated by searches for a keyword which involve variations of that phrase, and lets you know roughly how much traffic you’d get if you ranked number one for a given term.

Below is an example of Ahrefs’ ‘traffic potential’ metric in action. You can see that although the ‘online store builder’ keyword has a search volume of 1,000 per month, when phrase variations are factored in, the term actually has the potential to generate 4,000 visits per month to a site that ranks number one in Google for it.

As things stand, this sort of data isn’t available from leading competitors Moz and Semrush — it’s a really useful metric and something of a USP for Ahrefs.

(In fact, it’s one of my favourite Ahrefs features.)

In each type of keyword suggestion report, you’ll find useful filters that let you spot the ‘juicy’ or ‘untapped’ organic keywords that it might be possible for your site to rank for.

While not particularly hard to use, one thing that could make these filters slightly more user-friendly would be a more straightforward keyword difficulty score filter — the one provided requires you to enter in numerical ranges.

This is good from a granularity point of view, but some users — novices, perhaps — might prefer a simple ‘very easy / easy / hard / very hard’ style dropdown, like you get in Semrush:

AI-enhanced keyword suggestions in Ahrefs

In common with other SEO tools, Ahrefs has gradually been introducing AI-powered features into its platform. When you use its Keyword Explorer tool, you can ‘ask AI to suggest keywords related to your topic.’

When you use this feature, you’ll see a bunch of presets that you can apply to your research — these involve user challenges, comparative phrases, trends and more.

Applying them will surface keywords that the AI thinks will are particularly relevant to your chosen topic. In essence, this feature is good for brainstorming ‘seed keywords,’ suggesting a host of phrases that you might have struggled to come up with on your own.

Overall, I quite like this AI tool — it is indeed useful for sparking ideas. It would be better however if you were able to use it in a way that shows keywords that are easy to rank for — when testing the tool I found that it tended to give me a lot of suggestions that had really high keyword difficulties.

Accessing search intent data

SEO professionals tend to categorize keywords into four different ‘search intent’ buckets: ‘navigational’, ‘informational’, ‘commercial’ and ‘transactional.’

For example:

The aim of all this is to get a basic understanding of why somebody is entering a particular phrase into a search engine. If you have this, you can then filter keywords by intent type — and zone in on the most relevant ones.

So for example, if you wanted to sell coffee online, a good search intent feature would — at your request — hide a lot of informational or navigational queries (how to make a latte, the location of your nearest Starbucks etc.) and show you only the most relevant commercial / transactional queries instead.

Now, for a long time Ahrefs didn’t like this approach to classifying keywords —not too long ago, its CMO Tim Soulo had this to say about it:

And accordingly, the platform didn’t have much in the way of search intent features.

Recently though, there seems to have been a shift in thinking at Ahrefs — as demonstrated by the introduction of a new (and very good) search intent identification feature. Not only does it let you filter keywords by the ‘traditional’ search intent categories, it also lets you filter by ‘branded searches’ (i.e., those featuring brand names) and local searches (those featuring location-based keywords).

The feature is dead easy to use, and because of its more comprehensive categories, is actually better than the search intent tools available in Moz and Semrush (which for some time it lagged behind in this department).

Dealing with competing domains

When conducting keyword research, you obviously have to keep an eye on the domains that already rank for the phrases you’re targeting — if a bunch of really high-authority websites are already ranking for your chosen keyword, it will obviously be much harder to rank for that phrase.

Domains that are already performing well for a particular search phrase are really easy to identify in Ahrefs. You just scroll down to the bottom of the Keyword Explorer > Overview screen, where you’ll see a list of them in the ‘SERP overview’ panel, along with their domain rating scores, the URLs of pages that are ranking, the number of backlinks they have pointing to them and more.

It’s worth pointing out here that Ahrefs gives you a related feature for spotting keywords that only lower authority sites are ranking highly for.

When you’re reviewing keyword suggestions, you can use Ahrefs’ ‘lowest DR’ filter — pictured above — to only show keywords that are ‘owned’ by low authority domains. If you have a high-authority site, these domains should be easy to outrank (so long as the quality of your content is high).

Rank tracking

‘Rank tracking’ — also known as ‘position tracking’ — is the process of monitoring how your content (or that of a competitor’s) performs in search engines for particular keywords over time.

It’s easy to set this up in Ahrefs — you go to its suitably-named ‘Rank Tracker’ section, enter a domain name and the keywords you’d like to track, and you see a report showing you how that site is currently ranking for those keywords.

You can also track keywords on a per-country or even a town/city basis; this is helpful for local SEO efforts.

As time goes by — and more data about the keywords you’re tracking flows into Ahrefs — you’ll be able to monitor the progress of your attempts to rank a site higher for your chosen keywords.

If you like, you can set up email notifications about your current ranking status — and schedule these to be sent out automatically to you (or your SEO clients) on a weekly or monthly basis.

(Note however that daily updates are not available — this contrasts negatively with some competing tools, not least Semrush).

All in all, the rank tracking features in Ahrefs are good. However, one thing that you should note about them is that they are only available when you assign a domain to one of your Ahrefs ‘project slots.’

I’ll come back to project slots in more depth later, but basically you only get a limited number of them as part of your Ahrefs subscription (with the number available depending on how much you pay per month).

Backlink analysis

How strongly a piece of content performs in search results usually depends on how many ‘backlinks‘ — links from other sites to it — point to it.

To perform backlink analysis in Ahrefs, you enter a URL into its ‘Site Explorer’ tool. This gives you access to detailed ‘backlink profile’ data that lets you see:

The point of having this data is usually so that you can ‘reverse engineer’ the SEO success of a competitor — by knowing who’s linking to their site, you can approach the same websites, asking for a link to yours.

Ahrefs’ backlink data provided is laid out clearly, and lets you see when a particular domain has gained or lost links, along with the value of the links in question (i.e., the ‘domain rating’ and ‘URL rating’ scores for each linking URL).

How accurate this backlink analysis is, of course, depends on the size and quality of the Ahrefs link database.

At time of writing, Ahrefs claims to have 35 trillion backlinks in its database — a bit less than those of key competitors Semrush and Moz, which claim to have 43 trillion and 44.8 trillion respectively in theirs.

(Ahrefs argues that size isn’t everything and that each tool counts links differently — you can learn more about Ahrefs’ approach here).

I was curious however to see how this played out in some real-world tests, so I performed some backlink analysis on some well-known sites (domains for the ecommerce platforms and design tools we typically work with) to see how Ahrefs fared against leading competitors Semrush and Moz.

Here are the number of referring domains for these sites that I found with each tool:

Now, it should be said that this piece of backlink research involved a small number of domains — so it shouldn’t be treated as gospel.

But that said, the results did follow a pattern that generally aligned with the database sizes of the platforms being tested — the tools with the bigger databases (Moz and Semrush) surfaced more referring domains than Ahrefs.

Next, let’s take a look at link building. But just before that, a quick note about one of its key competitors.

Link building in Ahrefs

Many prospective users of Ahrefs will be interested in using it for backlink building. After all, the more high-quality links that point to a website, the better it typically performs in search results.

There are three main features provided by Ahrefs that can help you with your link building strategies:

Let’s discuss each briefly in turn.

Using the Site Explorer to identify link building opportunities

Using Ahrefs’ ‘Site Explorer’ feature is the simplest way to identify link building opportunities.

To do this you enter a URL into it — typically a competitor’s — and then click on the ‘Backlinks’ option in the ‘Backlink profile’ section.

You’ll then see a list of all the backlinks that Ahrefs can find which point to that URL (see screenshot below).

You can then try to find contact details for those domains, and approach their owners for a backlink.

Now, while this Ahrefs feature definitely gives you valuable data for backlink outreach purposes, what you won’t get here — and which you do get from key competitor Semrush — is a way to manage the outreach process.

In Semrush, you are given a CRM-style tool to keep tabs on any link building campaign; this gives you a ‘sales pipeline’ style approach that you can use during outreach. Not only that, but Semrush lets you connect your email account to it, and actually surfaces contact details for the websites you identify as targets.

With Ahrefs, you end up exporting a list of links to Excel, researching contact details yourself, and making notes on a spreadsheet regarding who you’ve contacted or not. You might also end up using an email marketing app to send out your pitches.

It all amounts to a more manual process than you might like, and one which involves more a lot more tools / apps.

So the data provided is great — but you’re going to have to be prepared to do stuff with it!

Using the Content Explorer for link building purposes

Ahref’s ‘Content Explorer’ feature gives you a really nice, simple way to identify websites that are worth approaching for a backlink. You simply enter a topic into the tool, and it provides you with a list of high-authority pages and websites about that topic.

You’ll also get a list of ‘top authors’ that are particular experts on the topic, and where available, their Twitter details, which can help you contact them.

Again, it would be better if a bit more contact surfacing was available — in the form of some author email addresses being provided — but this is nonetheless a useful way to identify good backlink outreach targets.

Using Ahrefs Alerts to spot backlink building opportunities

Finally, there’s ‘Ahrefs Alerts’ to consider as part of your backlink building toolkit.

This lets you enter a competitor’s URL into it (or indeed your own); once this is done, you’ll start to receive regular email alerts containing a list of all the latest sites linking to that URL.

This gives you the opportunity to contact the owner of the linking websites, asking that person to link to your website too.

Broken link building

Broken link building is an important SEO strategy.

It involves finding a broken link (i.e., one that no longer leads to a live page), recreating the ‘dead’ content that it used to point to, then asking anybody who used to link to the dead content to link to your new content instead.

This approach allows you to build up new backlinks to your content — and, because of the emphasis that Google places on backlinks to your site, this can bring improved rankings.

In order to make the strategy work, you obviously need to be able to identify broken links, and Ahrefs makes it really easy to do this. You just enter a domain name into its ‘Site Explorer’ section and click the Broken backlinks option (in the ‘Backlink profile’ section).

This then outputs a list of all that domain’s broken inbound links, and the sites where these links feature.

Additionally, Ahrefs makes it very easy to spot broken outbound links too — i.e., links from your site to other URLs that don’t work any more.

It’s important to ensure that your web pages don’t contain these, as they can be interpreted as a sign of poor quality content by Google and other search engines (with negative implications for rankings).

To find these broken outbound links in Ahrefs, you just enter a domain into the ‘Site Explorer’ tool, go to the ‘outgoing links’ section and hit the ‘broken links’ option to view results.

It should be noted that the way that Ahrefs surfaces broken backlinks (both inbound and outbound) is superb — the process for doing this is much easier in Ahrefs than in competing tools Moz and Semrush.

Site auditing and technical SEO

One of the key reasons that SEO professionals use tools like Ahrefs is to stay on top of the technical side of SEO.

This is because Google and other search engines are increasingly placing a higher emphasis on the technical performance of websites — things like site speed, security, and mobile-friendliness.

Ahrefs helps you improve your technical SEO via its ‘Site Audit’ feature. During a site audit, Ahrefs crawls your site for issues that might be having a negative effect on your search ranking, including:

Overall, you’ll get a very useful report from this process and a good picture of your site’s health. And it doesn’t matter what platform or CMS you’ve built your site on — regardless of whether you use Wix or Shopify, WordPress or Squarespace etc., you can use the insights provided via an Ahrefs audit to make technical improvements to your site’s technical SEO setup.

But worth a particular mention is the fact that Ahrefs now includes detailed Core Web Vitals data in its site audit reports.

Core Web Vitals are an important (and evolving) set of targets from Google relating to the speed, responsiveness and stability of a website, and sites that meet them can receive higher rankings in search results.

In Ahrefs you get two different types of Core Web Vitals stats: ‘field data‘ which is based on real user experience of your website (this comes from Chrome users) and ‘lab data,’ which is performance data collected within a controlled environment.

(Note: to get the Chrome data, you’ll need to connect your Ahrefs account to Google’s PageSpeed Insights API — see screenshot below.)

The availability of both field data and lab data means that Ahrefs has an edge over key competitor Semrush here, because Semrush only provides Core Web Vitals metrics based on Lighthouse lab data.

Interface and ease-of-use

Ahrefs’ interface consists of a horizontal menu of options at the top of the screen; when you click an item, a sub-menu giving you access to more features appears on the left.

This is a fairly traditional-style approach to navigation, and one that should feel familiar to most users.

The menu options on the left are grouped together in useful and intuitive categories — backlink profile, organic search, paid search etc.

There is a lot of data to contend with — this may feel a bit overwhelming at first, but you soon get used to it (and the whole point of tools like Ahrefs is, of course, to provide you with a lot of data!).

Increasingly, Ahrefs is taking more of a ‘data visualization’ approach to presenting data than it used to — and its clear graphs and other graphical presentation of SEO data do help make all the metrics provided more digestible.

As with other leading SEO tools, it would be good if the Ahrefs’ interface could be made to work better with smartphones however — it’s not fully ‘responsive’, meaning that if you log into Ahrefs on a mobile device, you see the standard desktop interface.

The means having to read very small text and doing a lot of pinching and zooming, as the screenshot below highlights.

To be fair to Ahrefs however, it’s unlikely you’d want to do an awful lot of SEO research on a phone!

However, it would be good if a mobile version of Ahrefs was available that let you access some core data easily on a mobile device — position tracking perhaps, or new backlink notifications. As things stand, there are no Android or iOS apps available for Ahrefs at all, which puts it at a slight disadvantage to Semrush, which does provide a mobile app (for position tracking only, though).

Finally, the Ahrefs interface, while easy to use, could return data a bit faster. Depending on the type of report you’re pulling, you may find yourself looking at a spinning wheel slightly longer than you might like (I found this to be a particular issue when analyzing larger websites). Competing platforms like Semrush and Moz seem to return their metrics more quickly.

Pricing and value for money

There’s no way round it: SEO tools like Ahrefs are, by comparison to a lot of other digital tools, very expensive!

That’s understandable however, as with these sorts of solutions you’re not just paying for functionality, you’re paying for access to huge quantities of data, including a lot of competitor intelligence.

Ahrefs provides four main pricing plans:

Recently, Ahrefs also introduced a $29 per month ‘Starter’ plan — this gives you cut-down access to its ‘Site Explorer’, ‘Keywords Explorer’, and ‘Site Audit’ tools.

These fees are broadly comparable to those charged by key competitors Moz, Semrush and Majestic.

The key differences between the Ahrefs plans involve:

Access to core features

One of the most significant downsides of the Ahrefs pricing structure is that its ‘Lite’ plan — despite being priced at $129 per month — prevents you from accessing several key features, including:

(Historical data is limited to just 6 months on the ‘Lite’ plan too).

For context, Semrush’s similarly priced plan doesn’t really restrict access to core features like these — its limitations are mainly to do with how many projects you can work on, and how much data you can pull each month.

The main upshot here is that if you are serious about SEO, you will be nudged firmly in the direction of the ‘Standard’ plan — the ‘Lite’ plan will usually be too restrictive for professional SEO applications.

Number of projects

It’s important to be aware that if you want to use Ahrefs’ site audit or rank tracking features, you can only do so on domains that have been added as ‘projects.’

And how many projects you can add depends on the Ahrefs plan you’re on — you get 5 projects on its $129 per month plan; 20 on its $249 per month plan; 50 on its $449 per month plan; and 100 on its $14,990 per year plan.

These limits are pretty generous by comparison to competing tools, and there’s more good news: if you can ‘verify’ a domain with Ahrefs, it doesn’t count towards your project limit at all!

Verification simply means proving that you have editorial rights to or ownership of a website; you can do this by:

The ability to work with an unlimited number of verified domains means that it’s possible to analyze a lot of websites in Ahrefs at a comparatively low cost — and for me, the this represents the best-value aspect of Ahrefs’ pricing structure.

Number of reports

Until recently, Ahrefs was extremely ungenerous when it came to the number of reports you could pull with the tool each month (keyword query reports, backlink reports etc.).

But changes to its pricing structure have seen the introduction of unlimited access to data (with a fair use policy applying) on its $249/mo Standard Plan and higher. This makes these plans very attractive, especially when you consider that they also let you track an unlimited number of verified websites.

The bad news is that ungenerous reporting limits still apply to Ahrefs’ most affordable plans — its $29/mo ‘Starter’ and $129/mo ‘Lite’ plan cap the number of reports you can pull at 100 and 500 respectively.

Where the ‘Starter’ plan is concerned, I can live with this limit: $29 per month isn’t very much to pay to get your hands on the sort of competitive intelligence that Ahrefs provides, and expecting unfettered access to all of it at that price point would be ridiculous.

More problematic is the 500 reports per month cap on the ‘Lite’ plan: paying $129/mo for software is a considerable investment for a lot of small businesses; and, when you factor in all the other feature restrictions that Ahrefs applies to this plan, it starts to feel very expensive for what you get.

This feeling becomes more pronounced when you consider that Ahrefs’ arch rival Semrush gives you access to 3,000 reports per day on its similarly priced plan.

Ahrefs is also ungenerous when it comes to the number of rows it outputs in its reports. For example, while similarly-priced Semrush and Moz plans both give you keyword research reports featuring 10,000 results, Ahrefs’ equivalent limit on its $129 plan is 2,500.

(As you go up the pricing ladder, the Ahrefs row export limits become more consistent with those of competing tools, however.)

Number of keywords you can track

Another key difference between Ahrefs pricing plans involves the number of keywords you can track. On the ‘Lite’ entry level plan the limit is 750; this rises to 2,000, 5,000 and 10,000 on the Standard, Advanced and Enterprise plans respectively.

(These limits are fairly consistent with those of competing SEO tools).

If you need more flexibility on this front however, you can buy a ‘Rank Tracker’ add-on. This lets you pay $50 per month for each additional 500 keywords you want to track.

Customer support

SEO tools like Ahrefs can be complex and quite hard to understand, so the availability and format of customer support is often a key consideration for users.

You get live chat and email support with Ahrefs, but no phone support (something provided by key rival Semrush).

On the plus side, Ahrefs makes its contact details very easy to spot — a live chat box is visible at the corner of each page, with estimated wait times provided on it, too.

It’s worth noting that Ahrefs support is currently available in English only, however. This is a shame, because the platform is actually available in 14 languages (you can use a language switcher at the bottom of the interface to switch to your preferred one).

Ahrefs review: conclusion

It’s not the cheapest tool of its kind available, but overall Ahrefs will be a very good solution for many SEO campaigns. It gives you access to a wealth of information that, used carefully, can help significantly increase the levels of organic traffic to a website. The unlimited reporting on some of its plans aimed at SMEs is very welcome, as is its ‘domain verification’ system that lets you work on a large number of SEO projects simultaneously.

Ahrefs is not without its flaws, however. Chief amongst these is the fact that there’s no free trial — given the investment involved in using the software out, it seems unfair not to let users try it out for at least a few days. Additionally, its cheaper plans’ reporting limits are ungenerous; there is only one user account included, regardless of plan; and its rank-tracking add-on is expensive.

Because of the quality of data it gives you, it’s definitely worth serious consideration as an SEO tool, though — and I’ll leave you with a summary of the key pros and cons of Ahrefs below. Feel free to leave any questions or feedback you have about the platform in the comments section below.

Pros and cons of Ahrefs — summary

Alternatives to Ahrefs

Ahrefs is one of the best-known SEO tools available — but not the only one! Alternative options for SEO analysis include:

For more information about how Ahrefs compares to key competing tools, do check out our Ahrefs vs Semrush comparison and our Moz vs Ahrefs comparison.

If you’re interested in checking out Semrush — the most obvious alternative to Ahrefs — you’ll find our full Semrush review here, our Ahrefs vs Semrush shootout here, and our Semrush pricing guide here. We have also published a comparison of Moz, Ahrefs and Semrush and recently, an Ubersuggest vs Semrush comparison.

You may also find our SpyFu vs Semrush blog post and our Semrush vs SpyFu YouTube comparison of interest; and you can watch a video review of Ahrefs here.